Is the Reproduction Legitimate?

Given: A work of art is an expression of creativity and imagination which, in visual form, is usually an image or sculpture, to be appreciated primarily for its beauty and/or emotional power. Further, I think we can agree that it is better to own or view an original work of art than a reproduction and a reproduction is not a forgery unless it is presented as the original.

In last week’s Missive https://www.geraldstiebel.com/2025/02/exhibitions-for-2025.html I wrote about an exhibition of many replicas of Michelangelo’s sculptures, coming to Copenhagen based on the reasoning that the vast majority of the originals cannot travel. I would think that such a show would be a great educational tool affording the public, which would not have the opportunity to travel to all the locations, the ability to see what an important artist Michelangelo was. A museum might be able to acquire a number of Rembrandts or put together an exhibition of most of Vermeer’s known work, as the Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam did a couple of years ago, but this is not possible with Michelangelo’s monumental sculptures.

If, however, a museum owns a work of art, is it legitimate for it to exhibit a replica? Noah Charney, a best-selling author of books on art and a professor of art history at a number of universities wrote an article called, “A Fake of Art” in which he explores the subject. He uses as a prime example the Albertina in Vienna with its world-renowned collection of works on paper. The “rule” is that a work on paper, particularly by the Old Masters like Albrecht Dürer, should not be on view for more than 3 months at a time. Therefore, if an exhibition lasts longer, the work of art is replaced by a replica. I ask, is it better to leave a gap of a major work of art in a show or leave a facsimile in to complete the story; if you identify it as a replica?

One of the longest running art stories is whether the Elgin Marbles in the British Museum should be returned to the Parthenon in Greece. In the current climate it seems quite possible that they will be, and one current solution in the form of reproductions is being promoted. In a December 10, 2024 article in the London News Paper, the Telegraph, a headline, “Oxford-based Roger Michel is offering to replace the original sculptures with replicas that are accurate to a fraction of a millimetre”. Roger L. Michel, Jr. is founder and executive director of the Institute for Digital Archeology (IDA). Here is a brief biography of Mr. Michel and his organization. https://digitalarchaeology.org.uk/people

Already in 2022, The New York Times published an article by Franz Lidz saying, that, “Roger Michel… believes the long-running dust-up can be resolved with the help of 3-D machining. His University of Oxford-based research consortium has developed a robot with the ability to create faithful copies of large historical objects.”

In an article for an Australian publication last June Georgia Hitch and Marc Fennell wrote “Using state-of-the-art technology in a warehouse-like workshop, digital archaeologist Roger Michel and his team are recreating the hotly contested Parthenon marbles. The idea behind it is simple — make exact 3D replicas of the marbles and donate them to the British Museum in exchange for the return of the original sculptures to Greece.” The behind the scenes story: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-06-17/parthenon-elgin-marbles-greece-british-museum/103969352

My wife who was formerly a curator at the Metropolitan Museum, reminded me that the Met was one of many Western institutions that formed collections of plaster casts of the world’s great sculptures and architectural elements for educational purposes. She recalls when over 40 years ago a Met colleague was sent to identify what survived in storage under the West Side Highway and many were in a decayed state. In 2004 the restored remains of that collection that had numbered over 2,000 objects were gifted to the Institute of Classical Art and Architecture (ICAA) where they are exhibited in the Cast Hall at the organization’s Manhattan headquarters. Here is a plaster cast of Lorenzo de’Medici (1526-1534), Duke of Urbino by Michelangelo.

I came across an article from the New York Times in 1997 by Lisa W. Foderaro titled “The Met Pioneered with Reproductions”. In a brief article she calls attention to the fact that even before the Met was built, they used reproductions to publicize their collection. As opposed to the longer articles I have given links to this one is very short tracing their use of reproductions. https://www.nytimes.com/1997/02/18/nyregion/the-met-pioneered-with-reproductions.html

The Victoria and Albert Museum still proudly displays the finest examples from its plaster cast collection in the original galleries that were designed for it in 1873. The Cast Halls, featuring a replica of Michelangelo’s David, are currently touted as a “must-see” for visitors.

I hope I have given you something to ponder and decide for yourselves how you feel about the issue, and I have not mentioned AI once!