People always wonder what an art dealer does besides buy and
sell. The first, of course, is necessary
and the second is fervently sought after but there are many other demands on
our time.
Much of that occurs in fielding inquiries which we often
enjoy doing but in the last 15 or so years a great deal is in provenance research. For me it started in 1996 as we were about to
go into a gallery exhibition opening the director of the Metropolitan Museum at
the time stopped me. He said to me “You sold
that small wooden renaissance sculpture of the Madonna and Child attributed to
Nicolaus Gerhaert von Leiden that the Met just acquired and we want you to
write up it’s provenance for us”. I
said, “Philippe we sold that in 1947 (when I was 3 years old) for $3,000 and
the Met just paid a reported $3 million and you want me to do the research on
the piece?” He replied that $3,000 then
was the equivalent of $3 million in 1996.
Well, Philippe de Montebello was not considered the great museum
director that he was for his currency conversion skills and I thought he was
teasing me. But sure enough the next day
I had a phone call from the chairman of the Medieval department, William Wixom,
at the Metropolitan making the same request.
It was not as if I could say “no” so I went to our warehouse archives
and dug out the papers from the Vienna Rothschilds giving the details on the
original purchase and sale.
This was the very beginning of the search for Nazi War Loot. The art that the Nazis seized during World
War II and that had not found it’s way back to its rightful owners. The period in question are the years that Hitler was
in power from 1933 to 1945. Luckily, we
have archival material but since the firm had to first leave Germany in a hurry,
and then leave the Netherlands even quicker, much was lost.
If this happened once in a great while it would not be so
difficult, but this summer more than 15 years later I have received one or two
enquiries a week, and often from museum individuals who have not done the basic
research, such as finding their original invoice which might have the
information they are looking for right there in front of them. I also had an enquiry recently from an
auction house that wanted me to do research on the possibility that since we
had handled works of art from the Rothschilds, it was not impossible that we might have handled
this specific painting as well (we hadn’t).
Philippe de Montebello had an expression that I always loved. He would say that he did certain things for
“proven friends of the museum” and I like to subscribe to a similar code.
If I am asked by a curator I know who has been helpful to us
in the past I usually do the research without complaint but if it is a person
hired by the museum just to do this kind of work and they do not even know
where to start, if it was acquired more than a decade ago, considering the time
involved on my or my staff’s part, I will tell them that I charge $250 for each
search whether I turn something up or not.
I had several curators at one museum who kept pestering me with
provenance questions urge me to continue to charge because they felt badly
about how many times they came back to the well.
It has been suggested to me by lawyers and family that if we
no longer had the archive we would no longer have to look anything up, but then
you can become the victim of suspicion that you cannot prove is wrong, even
though you are sure it is. In all but
one case we have been able to prove the provenance of every work of art, and
that was not a question of Nazi War Loot but a piece of porcelain stolen from a
European museum a few years after WWII that we had purchased from a long-time
European colleague. We settled reasonably and amicably with the museum.
Another example of the typically frustrating enquiry occurred
several years ago regarding a set of paintings by an 18th century
Italian artist that had been sold by a German Jewish banker living in
Switzerland and our German Jewish firm in Amsterdam at the time. The banker owned this group of works and he
gave these to our firm on consignment against a loan with a right to sell. We succeeded in selling them to museums and
private collectors in the States. Suddenly
his nephew appears 60 years later and says that his uncle’s pictures
constituted Nazi war loot! By a total
fluke the documentation had been saved from the archives in Holland and was in our archive. All the details were there, including the
consignment/loan agreements and bank drafts.
On top of this the brother of the owner lived in Amsterdam at the time
and oversaw the entire transaction!
While there are many legitimate claims regarding Nazi War
Loot, a claim alone is not sufficient and I am glad that I can back up my
family’s good name.
Best damned blog on the Worldwide Web!
ReplyDelete